UKRAINIAN BULLETIN OF PSYCHONEUROLOGY

The Scientific and Practical Journal of Medicine
ISSN 2079-0325
DOI 10.36927/2079-0325

DIGITAL NOCEBO EFFECT: NEUROBIOLOGICAL MECHANISMS AND PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF MEDIA MISINFORMATION IN MEDICINE

Type of Article

In the Section

Index UDK:

Abstract

Aim: comprehensive analysis of the neurobiological, psychopharmacological, and behavioral mechanisms underlying the digital nocebo effect induced by media misinformation.

An integrative review of scientific literature was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Publications from the last decade concerning the nocebo effect, cyberchondria, neurobiology of pain, and the impact of social media on pharmacotherapy efficacy were systematically analyzed.

The digital nocebo effect is proven to be not merely a psychological phenomenon, but a complex neurobiological response initiated by media-induced stress. The pathogenetic basis involves hyperactivation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the cholecystokinin system, leading to central nocebo hyperalgesia, as well as the suppression of endogenous opioid and dopaminergic transmission. On a psychopharmacological level, cyberchondria and doomscrolling cause somatic amplification and persistent autonomic shifts. These can objectively alter the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs (particularly statins and psychotropic medications), forming nocebo-induced therapeutic resistance.

Medical misinformation in the digital environment directly interferes with patients’ physiological processes, catastrophically reducing compliance and the effectiveness of evidence-based medicine. Overcoming this phenomenon requires abandoning paternalism, implementing predictive screening (Q-No questionnaire), applying "prebunking" communication strategies, and integrating medical media literacy principles into daily clinical practice.

Pages

References

  1. Yeung AWK, Tosevska A, Klager E, Eibensteiner F, Tsagkaris C, Parvanov ED, Nawaz FA, Völkl-Kernstock S, Schaden E, Kletecka-Pulker M, Willschke H, Atanasov AG. Medical and HealthRelated Misinformation on Social Media: Bibliometric Study of the Scientific Literature. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 25;24(1):e28152. DOI:10.2196/28152
  2. Starcevic V, Berle D. Cyberchondria: towards a better understanding of excessive health-related Internet use. Expert Rev Neurother. 2013 Feb;13(2):205-213. DOI:10.1586/ern.12.162
  3. Pan W, Liu D, Fang J. An Examination of Factors Contributing to the Acceptance of Online Health Misinformation. Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 1;12:630268. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630268
  4. Chornomydz AV. Medičnì fejki v zasobah masovoï ìnformacìï: analìz pričin, naslìdkìv ta strategìj protidìï [Medical misinformation in the mass media: an analysis of causes, consequences, and counterstrategies]. Vìsnik socìal'noï gìgìêni ta organìzacìï ohoroni zdorov’â Ukraïni [Bulletin of Social Hygiene and Health Care Organization of Ukraine]. 2025;4:46-52. DOI:10.11603/1681-2786.2025.4.15896  (In Ukrainian).
  5. Chornomydz, A., Lukaniuk, M. Medična dezìnformacìâ âk zbroâ: analìz rosìjs'kih ìnformacìjno-psihologìčnih operacìj u sferì ohoroni zdorov’â proti Ukraïni [Medical disinformation as a weapon: an analysis of Russian information and psychological operations in the field of healthcare against Ukraine]. Nacìonal'nì ìnteresi Ukraïni [National interests of Ukraine]. 2025;11(16):543-558. DOI:10.52058/3041-1793-2025-11(16)-543-558 (in Ukrainian).
  6. Alpert JS. Placebo and Nocebo Effects, Medication Bias, and Hearsay. Am J Med. 2019 Sep;132(9):1003-1004. DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.03.037
  7. Vismara M, Caricasole V, Starcevic V, et al. Is cyberchondria a new transdiagnostic digital compulsive syndrome? A systematic review of the evidence. Compr Psychiatry. 2020;99:152167. DOI:10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152167
  8. Doherty-Torstrick ER, Walton KE, Fallon BA. Cyberchondria: Parsing Health Anxiety From Online Behavior. Psychosomatics. 2016 Jul-Aug;57(4):390-400. DOI:10.1016/j.psym.2016.02.002
  9. Blasini M, Corsi N, Klinger R, Colloca L. Nocebo and pain: An overview of the psychoneurobiological mechanisms. Pain Rep. 2017 Mar-Apr;2(2):e585. DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000000585
  10. Rodrigues B, Raghuraman N, Shafir R, et al. Placebo and nocebo effects. Pain. 2025 Nov 1;166(11S):S111-S115. DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003637
  11. Krishnamurthy A, Bradley C, Ascunce R, Kim SM. SAMSON and the Nocebo Effect: Management of Statin Intolerance. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 Sep;24(9):1101-1108. DOI:10.1007/s11886-022-01729-x
  12. Mitsikostas DD. Nocebo in headache. Curr Opin Neurol. 2016 Jun;29(3):331-336. DOI:10.1097/WCO.0000000000000313
  13. A Mestre T. Nocebo and lessebo effects. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2020;153:121-146. DOI:10.1016/bs.irn.2020.04.005
  14. Car E, Vandenplas Y, Lacosta TB, et al. Mitigating the Nocebo Effect in Biosimilar Use and Switching: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceut Med. 2024 Nov;38(6):429-455. DOI:10.1007/s40290-024-00541-y
  15. Amanzio M. Nocebo effects and psychotropic drug action. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;8(2):159-161. DOI:10.1586/17512433.2015.992877
  16. Rossettini G, Camerone EM, Carlino E, Benedetti F, Testa M. Context matters: the psychoneurobiological determinants of placebo, nocebo and context-related effects in physiotherapy. Arch Physiother. 2020 Jun 11;10:11. DOI:10.1186/s40945-020-00082-y
  17. Bräscher AK, Kleinböhl D, Hölzl R, Becker S. Differential Classical Conditioning of the Nocebo Effect: Increasing HeatPain Perception without Verbal Suggestions. Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 13;8:2163. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02163
  18. Jungmann SM, Gropalis M, Schenkel SK, Witthöft M. Is cyberchondria specific to hypochondriasis? J Anxiety Disord. 2024 Mar;102:102798. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2023.102798
  19. Törnberg, P. Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0203958. Published 2018 Sep 20. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0203958
  20. Chornomydz, A. V. Analìz fenomenu ìnformacìjnoï fìl'tracìjnoï bul'baški v sučasnomu naukovo-osvìtn'omu seredoviŝì [Analysis of the phenomenon of the information filter bubble in the modern scientific and educational sphere]. Medična osvìta [Medical Education]. 2025;4:116-121. DOI:10.11603/m.2414-5998.2025.4.15855 (In Ukrainian).
  21. Starcevic V, Berle D, Arnáez S. Recent Insights Into Cyberchondria. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2020 Aug 27;22(11):56. DOI:10.1007/s11920-020-01179-8
  22. Flack M, Burton WH, Caudwell KM. I rely on a  little help from my friends: the effect of interpersonal and intrapersonal emotion regulation on  the relationship between FOMO and problematic internet use. BMC Psychiatry. 2024 May 24;24(1):384. DOI:10.1186/s12888-024-05834-9
  23. Gori A, Topino E, Gioia F, Casale S. Problematic Social Media Use in Young Adults: A Mixed Serial-Parallel Mediation Model Involving Alexithymia, Defense Mechanisms, and Fear of Missing Out. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2024 May;27(5):340- 346. DOI:10.1089/cyber.2023.0386
  24. Fedortsiv O, Chornomydz A, Chornomydz I, Chornomydz Yu. Internet-zaležnìst', zaležnìst' vìd socìal'nih merež ta smartfonìv âk element adiktivnoï povedìnki pìdlìtkìv [Internet, social media, and smartphone addiction as elements of addictive behavior in adolescents]. Psychosomatic Medicine and General Practice. 2025;10(3). URL: https://ww.e-medjournal.com/index.php/psp/article/view/646 (дата звернення: 15.03.2026). (In Ukrainian).
  25. Chen X, Peng S, Guan H, et al. Effect of emotional intelligence on problematic mobile social media use: mediating role of peer relationships and experiential avoidance. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1558733. Published 2025 Jun 19. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1558733
  26. Krahé C, Koukoutsakis A, Fotopoulou A. Updating beliefs about pain following advice: Trustworthiness of social advice predicts pain expectations and experience. Cognition. 2024;246:105756. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105756
  27. Blasini M, Peiris N, Wright T, Colloca L. The Role of Patient-Practitioner Relationships in Placebo and Nocebo Phenomena. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2018;139:211-231. DOI:10.1016/bs.irn.2018.07.033
  28. Druart L, Bailly-Basin E, Dolgopoloff M, et al. Using contextual factors to elicit placebo and nocebo effects: An online survey of healthcare providers’ practice. PLoS One. 2023 Sep 1;18(9):e0291079. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0291079
  29. Chamsi-Pasha M, Albar MA, Chamsi-Pasha H. Minimizing nocebo effect: Pragmatic approach. Avicenna J Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;7(4):139-143. DOI:10.4103/ajm.AJM_59_17