1. Cheng S. C., Schepp K. G. Early Intervention in Schizophrenia: A Literature Review // Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2016. 30 (6). p. 774—781. DOI: 10.1016/j.apnu.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 23. PMID: 27888974.
2. Maruta N. O. Pershyi epizod psykhozu: mozhlyvosti rannoho vtruchannia [The first episode of psychosis: possibilities of early intervention]. Za materialamy Naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii "Psykhichni ta psykholohichni rozlady pid chas viiny: likuvannia ta reabilitatsiia" (24—25 travnia 2023 r.). Zdorov’ia Ukrainy. Tematychnyi nomer "Nevrolohiia. Psykhiatriia. Psykhoterapiia" [Health of Ukraine. Thematic number "Neurology. Psychiatry. Psychotherapy"]. 2023. No. 3 (66): 32-33 https://health-ua.com/ article/73934-pershij-epzod-psihozu–mozhlivost-rannogovtruchannya.
3. Rannie vtruchannia v psykhoz (novi diahnostychni ta terapevtychni paradyhmy) [Early intervention in psychosis (new diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms)] / ed.: P. V. Voloshyn, N. O. Maruta. Kharkiv : Strokov D. V., 2019. 335. [In Ukrainian]
4. The impact of causal explanations on outcome in people experiencing psychosis: a systematic review / [L. Carter, J. Read, M. Pyle, A. P. Morrison] // Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2017. 24. p. 332—47. DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2002. Epub 2016 Jan 25. PMID: 26805779.
5. Remote administration guidelines: Positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) A joint industry announcement by Mark Opler, PhD, MPH (Chief Research Officer, MedAvante- ProPhase). https://mhs.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ Remote-Administration-Guidelines-PANSS-GUIDE.pdf. 6. Andreasen N. C. The scale for the assessment of negative symptoms (SANS): conceptual and theoretical foundations // British Journal of Psychiatry. 1989. 155(S7). P. 49—58. PMID: 2695141.
7. Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS): Recent developments in ascertainment and scaling // Psychopharmacology Bulletin. 1988. 24(1). P. 97—99.
8. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice/ Busner J., Targum S. D. // Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007. No. 4(7). Р. 28—37.
9. Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM-IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social functioning / P. L. Morosini, L. Magliano, L. Brambilla [et al.] // Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2000. No. 101. Р. 323—329. PMID: 10782554.
10. Rogov E. I. A handbook by a practical psychologist. The work of a psychologist with older adults. URI: https://stud.com.ua/17593/ psihologiya/metodika_diagnostiki_rivnya_sotsialnoyi_frustrirovannosti_ vasserman#81.
11. Method for predicting drug compliance in psychiatry: methodological recommendations / NIPNI im. V. M. Bekhtereva: compiled by: N. B. Lutova et al. St. Petersburg, 2007. 24 p. [In Russian].
12. Psychodiagnostics of personality tolerance / ed. G. U. Soldatova, L. A. Shaigerova. M.: Smysl, 2008. 172 p. [In Russian].
13. Залевский Г. В. Психическая ригидность в норме и патологии. Томск : Изд-во Томского ун-та, 1993. 272 с.
14. Garnefski N., Kraaij V. The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Psychometric features and prospective relationships with depression and anxiety in adults // European journal of Psychological Assessment. 2007. No. 23. P. 141—149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141
15. Larner A. J., Mitchell A. J. A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE) and the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) in the detection of dementia/ A. J. Larner, A. J. Mitchell// International Psychogeriatrics. 2014. No. 26(4). P. 555—563. DOI: 10.1017/ S1041610213002329.