UKRAINS'KYI VISNYK PSYKHONEVROLOHII

The Scientific and Practical Journal of Medicine
ISSN 2079-0325(p)
DOI 10.36927/2079-0325

STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES IN THE INTERNAL PICTURE OF THE DISEASE AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH DISCRITICALITY IN ANXIETY-PHOBIC AND SOMATOFORM DISORDERS

Type of Article

In the Section

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate nosospecific features of the internal picture of the disease by studying the prevalence and severity of certain types of attitude to the disease, identifying dependencies between the types of attitude to the disease in patients with anxiety-phobic and somatoform disorders.

48 patients with anxiety-phobic disorder — F40 (ICD-10) (group 1) and 54 patients with somatoform disorder — F45 (ICD-10) (group 2) were examined using the methods “Type of attitude towards illness”, Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD

In group 1, the types of attitude towards the disease prevailed: anxious (33.33 %), sensitive (31.25 %), anosognostic (16.67 %). A higher level of anxious type (25.54 vs. 19.59 points in group 2, p < 0.05), sensitive type (25.10 vs. 20.37 points, p < 0.05) was found. Hypochondriac (38.89 %), sensitive (25.93 %), anxious (24.07 %) prevailed in group 2. Hypochondriac (26.87 vs. 19.10 points in group 1, p < 0.01), apathetic (14.57 vs. 11.52 points in group 1, p < 0.01), egocentric (20.87 vs. 16.19 points in group 1, p < 0.05).

The prevalence of the anosognostic type of attitude in both groups was the same. The significant difference in anxiety-phobic disorders was at a higher level for anxious and sensitive types (p < 0.05). With somatoform disorders, it is higher for hypochondriac, melancholic, apathetic, egocentric types (p < 0.05). In anxiety-phobic disorders, the internal picture of the disease is characterized by a feeling of loss of control over one's own condition and the sphere of emotions. This is indicated by a positive correlation between the level of anxious attitude towards the disease and TAS-EOT scores (0.3741, p < 0.05). Discriticality is manifested by the formation of an anosognostic attitude to the disease with a decrease in anxiety (inverse correlation between anosognostic type and anxiety: –0.5264, p < 0.05). Or an emphasis on controlling one's own emotional sphere and supporting avoidant behavior. With somatoform disorders, the internal picture of the disease was dominated by a hypochondriac type of attitude to the disease, an increased level and a more significant role of alexithymia. Alexithymia also has a significant impact on the development of discriticality in somatoform disorders.

 

 

Pages

References

  1. Myk hailov B. V., Tabachnikov S. I., Maruta N. O., Kryshtal V. V., Serdiuk O. I. Stratehichni shliakhy rozvytku psykhoterapii ta medychnoi psykholohii v Ukraini. Ukrainskii medychnyi almanakh. 2004. T. 7, No. 4 (dodatok). S. 99—102. (In Ukrainian). URL: http://www.psychiatry.ua/articles/paper158.htm.
  2. Chugunov V. V. Norma v psikhiatricheskom izmerenii : monografiya. Lvov : Marchenko T. V., 2020. 632 s. (In Russian).
  3. A study of poor insight in social anxiety disorder / [Vigne P., Menezes G. B. de, Harrison B. J., Fontenelle L. F.] // Psychiatry Research. 2014. Vol. 219 (3). P. 556—561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.033.
  4. Insight in specific phobias: a forgotten bias / [Coelho, Carlos & Pisitsungkagarn, Kullaya & Taephant, Nattasuda & Barbosa, Fernando] // Acta Neuropsychologica. 2017. Vol. 15, no. 4. P. 467—476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.7774.
  5. Eaton W. W. Specific phobias / W. W. Eaton, O. J. Bienvenu, B. Miloyan // The Lancet Psychiatry. 2018. Vol. 5, Issue 8. P. 678— 686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30169-X.
  6. Social anxiety and its correlates among Lebanese adults: role of self-esteem, depression, alcohol use disorder, alexithymia, and work fatigue / Fares K., Haddad C., Malaeb D. [et al.] // The primary Care Companion for CNS Disorders. 2022. Vol. 24, no. 1. 20m02902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4088/PCC.20m02902.
  7. The cross-national epidemiology of specific phobia in the World Mental Health Surveys / Wardenaar K. J., Lim C. C. W., AlHamzawi A. O. [et al.] // Psychological Medicine. 2017. Vol. 47, no. 10. P. 1744—1760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291717000174.
  8. Pidlubnyi V. L. Otsinka stupenia vplyvu biopsykhosotsialnykh faktoriv na riven psykhichnoho zdorov'ia pratsivnykiv promyslovykh populiatsii. ScienceRise. 2016. Т. 2, No. 3. S. 21—29. (In Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2016.61159.
  9. Tabachnikov S. I., Mykhailov B. V., Maruta N. O. Aktualnyi stan ta perspektyvy psykhoterapii ta medychnoi psykholohii v Ukraini. Forum psykhiatrii ta psykhoterapii. 2004. T. 5, spets. vypusk. S. 34—40. (In Ukrainian). URL: http://www.psychiatry.ua/articles/paper159.htm.
  10. Mikhaylov B. V. Klinika i printsipy terapii somatoformnykh rasstroystv. Mezhdunarodnyy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2003. Т. 9, No. 1. S. 45—49. (In Russian). URL: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/bitstream/handle/123456789/52514/10-Mikhailov.pdf?sequence=1.
  11. Somatic symptoms, hypochondriasis and psychological distress: a study of somatisation in Australian general practice / [Clarke D. M., Piterman L., Byrne C. J., Austin D. W.] // The Medical journal of Australia. 2008. Vol. 189, no. 10. P. 560—564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb02180.x.
  12. Vizniuk I. M. Determinanty rozvytku ipokhondrychnykh yavyshch u fakhivtsiv riznykh profesii. Suchasni informatsiini tekhnolohii ta innovatsiini metodyky navchannia u pidhotovtsi fakhivtsiv: metodolohiia, teoriia, dosvid, problemy. 2016. No. 46. S. 128—132. (In Ukrainian). URL: https://vspu.net/sit/index.php/sit/article/download/2373/4947.
  13. Proskurina T. YU. Trevozhno-fobicheskoye rasstroystvo u podrostkov. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii. 2010. T. 18, vyp. 3, No. 64. S. 51—54. (In Russian). URL: http://uvnpn.com.ua/upload/iblock/1c0/1c0aedf32774d716bf52b07691c86eda.PDF.
  14. Doma I. S., Pidlubnyi V. L. Kliniko-anamnestychni osoblyvosti khvorykh na sertsevo-sudynni zakhvoriuvannia z riznymy typamy ipokhondrychnoi symptomatyky. Psykhiatriia, nevrolohiia ta medychna psykholohiia. 2018. No. 9. S. 78—81. (In Ukrainian) URL: https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-5675-2018-9-11.
  15. Zaseda Yu. I. Mediko-psikhologicheskiye kharakteristiki patsiyentov s psikhosomaticheskimi i somatoformnymi rasstroystvami v kontekste kliniko-psikhofenomenologicheskogo issledovaniya. Mizhnarodnyi medychnyi zhurnal. 2015. 21, No. 3. S. 36—44. (In Russian). URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Mmzh_2015_21_3_10.
  16. Bagby R.M. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity / R. M. Bagby, G. J. Taylor, J. D. A. Parker // J. Psychosom. Res. 1994. Vol. 38. P. 33—40. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90006-x. 17. Zigmond, A. S. The hospital anxiety and depression scale / A. S. Zigmond, R. P. Snaith // Acta psychiatrica scandinavica. 1983. Vol. 67, Issue 6. P. 361—370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.