UKRAINS'KYI VISNYK PSYKHONEVROLOHII

The Scientific and Practical Journal of Medicine
ISSN 2079-0325(p)
DOI 10.36927/2079-0325

A PROGNOSTIC MODEL FOR ASSESSING THE RISK OF PSYCHOSOCIAL ADAPTATION IN PATIENTS WHO HAVE UNDERGONE CARDIOSURGICAL INTERVENTIONS

Type of Article

In the Section

Index UDK:

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to develop a prognostic model for assessing the risk of psychosocial maladjustment (PSM) in patients who have undergone cardiosurgical interventions (CI), taking into account a complex of surgical, neurological and psychopathological factors.

700 patients were examined after they underwent CI with an artificial blood circulation procedure: 86 patients with cerebral infarction, 217 patients with signs of postoperative encephalopathy and 504 patients with manifestations of cognitive dysfunction. For creating the model, non-linear modeling methods were used (multiple linear regression analysis with a linearized model).

Based on the research data, we proposed a complex model of PSM taking into account clinical, phenomenological and psychosocial factors. The model is based on a comprehensive assessment of three key vectors that can exert influence on the course of the postoperative period and the formation

The first vector (“surgical”) includes the main factors that characterize the severity of the surgical intervention, and which have the greatest impact on the course of the postoperative period. The quantification of this vector is based on the following indicators: the duration, body temperature and blood pressure during surgery.

The second vector (“neurological”) takes into account the main ischemic and neurological complications in the postoperative period: cerebral infarction, postoperative encephalopathy, and postoperative cognitive dysfunction. The quantitative assessment of this vector is based on the results of the study of the patient’s cognitive function in the early postoperative period, namely, the indicators of the TMT-A and TMT-B tests, and the Stroop test.

The third vector (“psychopathological”) includes three main psychopathological disorders: depression, anxiety, and aggressiveness, and its quantification is based on the integral indicators of depression and anxiety according to the depression and anxiety scales of M. Hamilton and indicators of aggressiveness and hostility according to the Bass-Darkie test.

The proposed model makes it possible to obtain informative predictive indicators of PSM, which are close to the values obtained by the diagnostic method of socio-psychological adaptation C. Rogers & R. F. Dymond in the modification of A. K. Osnytsky.

Pages

References

  1. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database: 2019 update on  outcomes and quality  / D’Agostino R. S., Jacobs J.P., Badhwar V. [et al.] // Ann Thorac Surg. 2019. Vol. 107(1). P. 24—32.
  2. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization / Neumann F.J., Sousa-Uva M., Ahlsson A. [et al.] // Eur Heart J. 2019. Vol. 40(2). P. 87—165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.
  3. Ayatollahi H. Predicting coronary artery disease: a comparison between two data mining algorithms / Ayatollahi H., Gholamhosseini L., Salehi M. // BMC Public Health. 2019. Vol. 19(1). P. 448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6721-5.
  4. Levett D.Z.H. Psychological factors, prehabilitation and surgical outcomes: evidence and future directions / D.Z.H. Levett, C. Grimmett  // Anaesthesia. 2019. Vol. 74. P. 36—42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14507.
  5. Wynter-Blyth V. Prehabilitation: preparing patients for surgery / V. Wynter-Blyth, K. Moorthy // BMJ. 2017. Vol. 358. P. 9—10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3702.
  6. Psychosocial perspectives in cardiovascular disease / [Pedersen S. S., von Känel R., Tully P. J., Denollet J.] // Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 108—115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487317703827.
  7. Significance of psychosocial factors in cardiology: update 2018 / Albus C., Waller C., Fritzsche K. [et al.] // Clin Res Cardiol. 2019. Vol. 108. P. 1175—1196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-019-01488-w.
  8. Demographic and psychological predictors of recovery from coronary artery bypass graft / Sadeghi M., Hashemi M., Sararoudi R. [et al.] // J Educ Health Promot. 2017. Vol. 6. P. 92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_154_16.
  9. Social factors, sex, and mortality risk after coronary artery bypass grafting: a population-based cohort study / Nielsen S., Giang K.W., Wallinder A. [et ]  // J  Am  Heart Assoc. 2019. Vol. 8(6). e011490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.118.011490.
  10. Pre-surgical depression and anxiety and recovery following coronary artery bypass graft surgery / Poole L., Ronaldson A., Kidd T. [et al.] // J Behav Med. 2017. Vol. 40. P. 249—258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9775-1.
  11. Psychosocial and medical predictors of 1-year functional outcome in male and female coronary bypass recipients / Young S., Linden W., Ignaszewski A. [et al.] // Hear Mind. 2019. Vol. 3. P. 113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/hm.hm_64_19.
  12. Cardiac prehabilitation / [McCann M., Stamp N., Ngui A., Litton E.] // J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019. Vol. 33. P. 2255— 2265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2019.01.023.
  13. Updating EuroSCORE by including emotional, behavioural, social and functional factors to the risk assessment of  patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a  study protocol  / Cromhout P. F., Berg S. K., Moons P. [et al.] // BMJ Open. 2019. Vol. 9. e026745. URI: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/7/e026745.
  14. Psychological Preparation for Cardiac Surgery / [Salzmann S., Salzmann-Djufri M., Wilhelm M., Eute – neuer ]  // Curr Cardiol Rep. 2020. Vol. 22(12). P. 172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-020-01424-9.