ГоловнаArchive of numbers2022Volume 30, issue 4 (113)Formation of beneficial and pathological neuroplasticity depending on the nature of the prognosis in different types of the course in patients with sporadic and familial forms of multiple sclerosis
Title of the article Formation of beneficial and pathological neuroplasticity depending on the nature of the prognosis in different types of the course in patients with sporadic and familial forms of multiple sclerosis
Authors Negreba Tetiana
Voloshyna Natalia
PogulyaevaTetiana
Chernenko Maksym
Vasylovskyi Vitalii
Voloshyn-Gaponov Ivan
In the section MECHANISMS OF FORMATION AND MODERN PRINCIPLES OF TREATMENT OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS
Year 2022 Issue Volume 30, issue 4 (113) Pages 18-22
Type of article Наукова стаття Index UDK 616.832-004.12:616.8-009 Index BBK -
Abstract DOI: https://doi.org/10.36927/2079-0325-V30-is4-2022-3

The purpose of the study: is to assess the influence of the nature of the prognosis on the formation of beneficial and pathological neuroplasticity, taking into account the type of course in sporadic and familial forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Research methods: by questionnaire and neurological examination in 84 patients, the analysis of clinical parameters occurring at different time stages in relapsing MS (RMS) and secondary-progressive MS (SPMS) (debut, relapsing stage (RS) in RMS and SPMS, progression stage in SPMS) in sporadic (54 patients) and fa- milial (30 patients) forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) was carried out. The nature of the prognosis (favourable for RMS — 38 patients; unfavourable for SPMS — 46 patients) was evaluated based on previously developed clinical diagnostic criteria using mathematical analysis. To study the mechanisms of formation of beneficial and pathological neuroplasticity on the models of different prognosis variants (favourable and unfavourable), the frequency of clinical indicators for the two forms of the disease was analyzed. With a favourable prognosis of RMS, mild debuts in sporadic and moderate debuts in familial forms significantly (p < 0.05) prevail. A tendency to predominance (p > 0.05) was obtained for monosyndromic debuts in sporadic and short oligosyndromic debuts in combination with an alternation of mild and mod- erate relapses in familial forms. For the unfavourable prognosis of SPMS, the steady variant of progression in the familial form significantly prevails. A tendency to predominance was found for polysyndromic debut of moderate severity in sporadic and short remission after debuting in combination with an alternation of severe and mild relapses in familial forms of RS. The data obtained indicate a less benign course of the familial form compared to the sporadic form due to the predominance of some clinical parameters with important prognostic value. The formation of alternative variants of prognosis (favourable in RMS and unfavourable in SPMS) oc- curs by selective involvement in a single pattern of clinical indicators at each time stage of the disease. The overwhelming majority of “different sets” of clinical parameters in sporadic and familial forms of MS indicates the differential involvement of beneficial neuroplasticity mechanisms for a favourable prognosis in RMS and pathological neuroplasticity for an unfavourable prognosis in SPMS.
Key words multiple sclerosis, t ype of MS course, prognosis, beneficial and pathological neuroplasticity
Access to full text version of the article pdf download
Bibliography 1. Rasseyannyy skleroz : klinicheskoye rukovodstvo / Boyko A. N. i dr.] ; pod red. Guseva E. I., Zavalishina I. A., Boyko A. N. Moskva : Real Taym, 2011. 528 s. (In Russian).
2. Shmidt T. E., Yakhno N. N. Rasseyannyy skleroz : ruko- vodstvo dlya vrachey / T. E. Shmidt, N. N. Yakhno. 5-e izd. M. : MEDpress-inform, 2016. 272 s. (In Russian).
3. Rozsiianyi skleroz: sytuatsiinyi analiz problemy v Ukraini / pidhotuvala T. Antoniuk za materialamy www.uairs.org. NEIROnews. No. 3 (96)’ 2018. S. 6—9. (In Ukrainian).
4. Chernenko M. E., Vovk V. I. Neyroplastichnost': ot Sant'yago Ramon-i-Kakhalya do nashikh dney (obzor literatury). Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii. 2018. T. 26, vyp. 1 (94). S. 116—123. In Russian).
5. Prosperini L., Piattella M. C., Giannì C., Pantano P. Func- tional and Structural Brain Plasticity Enhanced by Motor and Cognitive Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis. Neural Plasticity. 2015. No. 48. Р. 1574. DOI: 10.1155/2015/481574.
6. Damulin I. V. Osnovnyye mekhanizmy neyroplastichnosti ikh klinicheskoye znacheniye. Mizhnarodnyi nevrolohichnyi zhurnal. 2010. 5 (35). URI: http://www.mif-ua.com/archive/ article/13682. (In Russian).
7. Boffa G, Tacchino A, Sbragia E, Schiavi S, Droby A, Piag- gio N, Bommarito G, Girardi G, Mancardi GL, Brichetto G, Ing- lese M. Preserved brain functional plasticity after upper limb task-oriented rehabilitation in progressive multiple sclerosis. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020. 27 (1). P. 77—84. DOI: 10.1111/ene.14059.
8. Bogolepova A. N., Chukanova E. I. Problema neyroplas- tichnosti v nevrologii. Mіzhnarodnij nevrologіchnij zhurnal. 2010. 8 (38). (In Russian).
9. Chernenko M. Ie. Problema neirohenezu v umovakh terapii neirozapalnoho/neirodeheneratyvnoho protsesu. Mizhnarodnyi medychnyi zhurnal. 2019. T. 25, No. 2 (98). S. 53—56. URI: http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/161027. (In Ukrainian).
10. Chernenko M. Ie., Vovk V. I. Neiroplastychnist u khvorykh na rozsiianyi skleroz v umovakh zapalnoho protsesu. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii. 2018. T. 26, vyp. 2 (95). S. 29—32. (In Ukrainian).
11. Prosperini L, Di Filippo M. Beyond clinical changes: Rehabilitation-induced neuroplasticity in MS. Mult Scler. 2019 Sep; 25 (10): 1348-1362. doi: 10.1177/1352458519846096.
12. Nehreba T. V. Klinichna diahnostyka riznykh typiv perebihu rozsiianoho sklerozu : Zbirka anket. Svidotstvo pro reiestratsiiu avtorskoho prava na tvir No. 8675 vid 31.10.2003. (In Ukrainian).
13. Ajvazyan S. A., Bukhshtaber V. M., Yenyukov I. S., Me- shalkin L. D. ; pod red. S. A. Ajvazyana. Prikladnaya statistika. Klassifikatsiya i snizheniye razmernosti. Moskva : Finansy' i statis- tika, 1989. 608 s. (In Russian).
14. Voloshyna N. P., Nehreba T. V., Vasylovskyi V. V., Levchen- ko I. L., Yehorkina O. V., Tkachova T. M., Chernenko M. Ie., Ga- ponov I. K. Novi pidkhody do klinichnoi diahnostyky riznykh typiv perebihu rozsiianoho sklerozu i ikh dyferentsiiovana terapiia : praktychni rekomendatsii. Svidotstvo pro reiestratsiiu avtorskoho prava na naukovyi tvir No. 47786 vid 13.02.2013 r. (In Ukrainian).
15. Vasylovskyi V. V. Prohrediientni typy perebihu rozsiiano- ho sklerozu: kliniko-patohenetychna kharakterystyka perebihu, prohnoz ta novi pidkhody do stratehii likuvannia : dys. na zdo- buttia naukovoho stupenia d-ra med. nauk. Kharkiv, 2019. 467 s. (In Ukrainian).
16. Voloshina N. P., Negreba T. V., Vasilovskiy V. V., Sukho- rukov V. V., Kirzhner V. M. Kliniko-matematicheskiy analiz vzaimootnosheniy mezhdu kharakterom prognoza i osoben- nostyami debyutov pri raznykh tipakh techeniya rasseyannogo skleroza. Georgian Medical News. 2021. No. 9 (318). S. 127—133. (In Russian).
17. Voloshina N. P., Vasilovskij V. V., Negreba T. V., Levchen- ko I. L., Tkachyova T. N. Klynycheskaya kharakterystyka de- byutov rasseyannoho skleroza pry raznykh typakh techenyya s uchetom tekushcheho prohnoza. Ukraynskyy nevrolohycheskyy zhurnal. No. 4 (29). 2013. S. 7—13. URI: http://nbuv.gov.ua/ UJRN/UNJ_2013_4_3. (In Russian).
18. Negreba T. V., Kirzhner V. M. Differentsial'no-diagnosti- ches kiye kriterii kharaktera prognoza pri retsidiviruyushchem techenii rasseyannogo skleroza. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonev- rolohii. 2017. T. 25, vyp. 1 (90). S. 94—95. (In Russian).
19. Vasilovskij V. V., Voloshina N. P., Negreba T. V., Kirzh- ner V. M. Differentsial'no-diagnosticheskiye kriterii neblago- priyatnogo prognoza pri progrediyentnykh tipakh techeniya rasseyannogo skleroza. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii. 2017. T. 25, vyp. 1 (90). S. 71—72. (In Russian).
20. Nehreba T. V. Naukovyi tvir "Techenie i prognoz sovremenny'х form rasseyannogo skleroza". Svidotstvo pro reiest- ratsiiu avtorskoho prava na tvir No. 30251 vid 15.09.2009 (In Ukrainian).
21. Voloshyna N. P., Nehreba T. V., Vasylovskyi V. V., Kyrzh- ner V. M., Chernenko M. Ie., Voloshyn-Gaponov I. K. Formuvannia kharakteru prohnozu zalezhno vid shliakhiv rozvytku etapu prohresuvannia i variantiv prohresuvannia pry prohrediientnykh typakh perebihu rozsiianoho skleroz. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykho- nevrolohii. 2021. T. 29, vyp. 3 (108). S. 18—22. DOI : https:// doi.org/10.36927/2079-0325-V29-is3-2021-3. (In Ukrainian).