ГоловнаArchive of numbers2020Volume 28, issue 1 (102)Hardiness in aspects of suicidal prevention (Literature review)
Title of the article Hardiness in aspects of suicidal prevention (Literature review)
Authors Rothschild-Varibrus Velimar
Fritzsche Larysa
Korzhenevsky Stanislav
Mykhalchuk Oksana
Yermakov Leonid
Kyrylova Olena
Vovk Victoriia
Horbatovska Daria
In the section LITERATURE REVIEW
Year 2020 Issue Volume 28, issue 1 (102) Pages 84-88
Type of article Scientific article Index UDK 616.89-008.441.44:343.614 Index BBK -
Abstract DOI: https://doi.org/10.36927/20790325-V28-is1-2020-18


The review is devoted to the hardiness of the individual as a factor of specifi c protection, potentially capable of reducing the risk of developing suicidal behavior. The development of the concept of “hardiness” and the features of its application in the subject field of suicidology are considered. ”Hardiness” is understood as a key personality variable that mediates the influence of stressful factors (including chronic ones) on somatic and mental health, as well as on the success of an activity. It is hardiness that allows a person to endure the fatal anxiety that accompanies the choice of the future (uncertainty), and not the past (immutability) in a situation of existential dilemma. The source base of the study was 38 publications. High agreement was noted between the authors that hardiness is an important protective factor for the emergence of suicidal ideations, performs a buffer (antisuicidal) role in a situation of distress, and is part of the normative functions of the human adaptation system. The significance of the contribution of certain parameters of hardiness to the protection of anti-vital and suicidal behavior can vary individually and socioculturally. The linear nature of the influence of the components of the phenomenon of hardiness on the likelihood of anti-vital and suicidal behavior seems relative. Significant for the development of suicide prevention measures are evidence that suicidal risk is associated with a weakening of reserves of hardiness, and a decrease in this risk is possible by strengthening the potential of hardiness through targeted psychosocial interventions. The potential variability of the parameter “hardiness” allows us to consider it as an important target for the prevention of suicide.
Key words suicide, suicidal behavior, hardiness, suicide prevention
Access to full text version of the article pdf download
Bibliography 1. Programma Vsemirnoy organizatsii zdravoohraneniya «Zdorove — 21: politika dostizheniya zdorovya dlya vseh v Evropeyskom regione VOZ» // Evropeyskaya seriya po dostizheniyu zdorovya dlya vseh. URL: http: //www.euro.who.int/ ru/publications/abstracts/health21-the-health-for-all-policyframework-for-the-who-european-region. 
2. Kobasa S. C. Stressful Life Event, Personality and Health: an Inquiry into Hardiness // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979. No. 37. Р. 10—11. DOI: 10.1037//0022- 3514.37.1.1. 
3. Maddi S. R. Hardiness Training at Illinois Bell Telephone // In: Health promotion evaluation / J. P. Opatz (Ed.). Stevens Point (WI): National Wellness Institute, 1987. P. 101—115. 
4. Leontev D. A., Rasskazova E. I. Test zhiznestoykosti. M. : Smyisl, 2006. 63 s. 
5. Tillih P. Muzhestvo byit. V kn.: Tillih P. Izbrannoe. Teologiya kulturyi. M. : Yurist, 1997. S. 7—132. 6. Burhanov R. A. Nikulina O. V. Kontseptsiya ekzistentsialov v traktate M. Haydeggera «Byitie i vremya» // Obschestvo: filosofiya, istoriya, kultura. 2018. № 6. URL: https: //cyberleninka. ru/article/n/kontseptsiya-ekzistentsialov-v-traktate-m-haydeggera-bytie-i-vremya. 
7. Maddi S. R. Hardiness: An operacionalisation of existential courage // Journal of humanistic psychology. 2004. Vol. 44. No. 3. Р. 279—298. DOI: 10.1177/0022167804266101. 
8. Leontev D. A. Rasskazova E. I. Zhiznestoykost kak sostavlyayuschaya lichnostnogo potentsiala // Lichnostnyiy potentsial: struktura i diagnostika / pod red. D. A. Leonteva. M. : Smyisl, 2011. 680 s. 
9. Nikitina E. V. Fenomen zhiznestoykosti: kontseptsiya, sovremennyie vzglyadyi i issledovaniya // Academy. 2017. № 4(19). S. 100—103. 
10. Maddi S. R. Relevance of Hardiness Assessment and Training to the Military Context // Military Psychology. 2007. Vol. 19. No. 1. Р. 61—70. DOI: 10.1080/08995600701323301. 
11. Fominova A. N. Zhiznestoykost lichnosti. M. : MPGU, 2012. 152 s. 
12. Sagalakova O. A., Truevtsev D. V. Oprosnik «Anti vitalnost i Zhiznestoykost» // meditsinskaya psihologiya v Rossii. 2017. T. 9.№ 2(43). C. 4. URL: http://mprj.ru. 
13. Aleksandrova L. A. K kontseptsii zhiznestoykosti v psihologii // Sibirskaya psihologiya segodnya : sb. nauch. tr. Vyip. 2 / pod red. M. M. Gorbatovoy, A. V. Serogo, M. S. Yasnitskogo. Kemerovo : Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2004. S. 82—90. 
14. Borisov I. V., Gladyisheva A. G., Lyubov E. B. Ontologicheskiy vzglyad: suitsidalnoe povedenie i fenomen zhiznestoykosti // Suitsidologiya. 2013. T. 4, № 2. C. 35—44. 
15. Chistopolskaya K. A., Enikolopov S. N. Zhiznestoykost, vremennaya perspektiva lichnosti i otnoshenie k smerti v norme i posle suitsidalnoy popyitki // Sb. materialov nauch. konf. «Translyatsionnaya meditsina — innovatsionnyiy put razvitiya sovremennoy psihiatrii» (Samara, 19—21 sentyabrya 2013 g.) / Ministerstvo zdravoohraneniya Rossiyskoy Federatsii i dr. Samara, 2013. S. 194—195. 
16. Chistopolskaya K. A., Enikolopov S. N. Otnoshenie k smerti posle popyitki samoubiystva: stigmatizatsiya i samostigmatizatsiya suitsidalnyih patsientov // Vestnik psihiatrii i psihologii Chuvashii. 2015. T. 11, № 1. C. 8—20. 
17. Fang J., Freedenthal S., Osman A. Validation of the Suicide Resilience Inventory-25 with American and Chinese college students // Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 2015. Vol. 45, No. 1. P. 51—64. DOI: 10.1111/sltb.12108. 
18. Psychological Resilience provides no independent protection from suicidal risk / Liu D. W. Y., Fairweather-Schmidt A. K., Burns R. [et al.] // Crisis. 2016. Vol. 37, No. 2. P. 130—139. DOI:10.1027/0227-5910/a000364. 
19. Johnson J., Gooding P. A., Wood A. M., Tarrier N. Resilience as positive coping appraisals: Testing the schematic appraisals model of suicide (SAMS) // Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2010. Vol. 48. No. 3. P. 179—186. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.10.007. 
20. Resilience to suicidality: the buffering hypothesis / Johnson J., Wood A. M., Gooding P. [et al.] // Clinical Psychology Review. 2011. Vol. 31, No. 4. P. 563—591. DOI: 10.1016/j. cpr.2010.12.007. 
21. Knizhnikova S. V. Strukturno-funktsionalnoe opisanie zhiznestoykosti v aspekte uitsidalnoy preventsii // Materialyi IV Vserossiyskoy NPK «Fenomenologiya i profilaktika deviantnogo povedeniya». Krasnodar, 28—29 oktyabrya 2010. S. 67—70. 
22. Efimova O. I., Egorova O. I. Suitsidalnyie tendentsii v podrostkovom vozraste: faktoryi riska i zaschityi // Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivyi razvitiya psihologii otnosheniya cheloveka k zhiznedeyatelnosti : sb. nauch. tr., posvyasch. 125-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya V. N. Myasischeva / Vladim. gos. un-t im. A. G. i N. G. Stoletovyih, Gumanitar. in-t; In-t psihologi RAN. Vladimir; Moskva : Izd-vo VlGU, 2018. S. 154—159. 
23. Mamchenko A. M., Tsvetkova N. A. Issledovanie svyati zhiznestoykosti s urovnem suitsidalnogo riska u podsledstvennyih, soderzhaschihsya v sledstvennom izolyatore // Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psihologiya. 2017. № 3(40). S. 41—49. 
24. Mamchenko A. M. Sotsialno-psihologicheskaya model profilaktiki suitsida sredi podsledstvennyih, soderzhaschihsya pod strazhey v SIZO // Akademi ches kaya myisl. 2018. № 3 (4). S. 102—106. 
25. Vdovina O. I. Problemyi issledovaniya antisuitsidalnyih faktorov: osobennosti zhiznestoykosti u suitsidentov // Materialyi VI Mezhdunar. studench. nauch. konf. «Studencheskiy nauchnyiy forum — 2014». URL: https: //scienceforum.ru/2014/ article/2014001045. 
26. Efimova O. I., Vdovina O. I. Antisuitsidalnyie faktoryi: novyie grani issledovaniya // Materialyi II zaochnoy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. internet-konf. «Zdorove spetsialista: problemyi i puti resheniya» (1—31 oktyabrya 2012, g. Omsk). URL: https: // sites.google.com/site/zdorovespecialistaiii/home. 
27. Efimova O. I., Egorova O. I., Oschepkov A. A. Antisuitsidalnyiy potentsial lichnosti: teoriya i empirika // Simbirskiy nauchnyiy vestnik. 2018. # 2(32). S. 26—30. URL: https: //www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=35558302. 
28. Oschepkov A. A., Salahova V. B. Osobennosti suitsidalnogo povedeniya molodezhi i zhiznestoykosti lichnosti // Tam zhe. 2018. № 3(33). S. 28—36. URL: https: //readera.org/ osobennosti-suicidalnogo-povedenija-molodezhi-i-zhiznestojkostilichnosti-14114481. 
29. Efimova O. I., Igdyirova S. V., Oschepkov A. A. Zhiznestoykost lichnosti v ryadu osnovnyih faktorov preventsii riska suitsidalnogo povedeniya v praktike sotsialnyih sluzhb // Sovremennyie problemyi psihologii i obrazovaniya: v kontekste rabotyi s razlichnyimi kategoriyami detey i molodezhi / gl. red. R. E. Barabanov. M. : MITU-MASI, 2018. C. 247—250. 
30. Sagalakova O. A., Truevtsev D. V. Zhiznestoykost i dinamika suitsidalnogo povedeniya molodezhi // Vestnik psihologi i pedagogiki Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. № 1. S. 47—54. URL: http: //journal.asu.ru/vfp/article/view/1887. 
31. Koblik E. G., Sadovnikova T. A., Sotnikova Yu. A. Meryi profilaktiki suitsidalnogo povedeniya podrostkov, razvitie zhiznestoykosti. Lichnost v trudnyih zhiznennyih situatsiyah: resursyi i preodolenie // Materialyi Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyaschennoy 25-letiyu fakulteta psihologii Omskogo gosudarstvennogo un-ta im. F. M. Dostoevskogo (Omsk, 4—5 oktyabrya 2018 g.). Omsk : Izd-vo Om. gos. un-ta, 2018. S. 171—176. 
32. Lyubov E. B., Sumarokov Yu. A., Konoplenko E. R. Zhiznestoykost i faktoryi riska uitsidalnogo povedeniya korennyih malochislennyih narodov severa Rossii // Suitsidologiya. 2015. № 3. S. 23—30 33. Carrico A. Elevated Suicide Rate Among HIVPositive Persons Despite Benefits of Antiretroviral Therapy: Implications for a Stress and Coping Model of Suicide // Am. J. Psychiatry. 2010. Vol. 167(2). P. 117—119. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09111565. 
34. Vance D. E., Struzick T., Burrage J. R. Suicidal ideation, hardiness, and successful aging with HIV: considerations for nursing // Gerontol. Nurs. 2009. No. 35(5). Р. 27—33. DOI:10.3928/00989134-20090331-06. 
35. Abdollahi A., Abu Talib M., Nor Yaacob S. The Role of Hardiness in Decreasing Stress and Suicidal Ideation in a Sample of Undergraduate Students // Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 2014. Vol. 55, Iss. 2. Р. 202—222. DOI: 10.1177/0022167814543952. 
36. Masten A. S. Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development // Am. Psychologist. 2001. Vol. 6. P. 227—238. URL:https: //doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.227. 
37. Sagalakova O. A., Truevtsev D. V. Kulturno-spetsificheskie tipyi sotsialnoy trevogi i antivitalnyie ideatsii // Lichnost, semya i obschestvo: voprosyi pedagogiki i psihologii: sb. st. po materialam LXXI mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. # 12(69). Novosibirsk : SibAK, 2016. S. 42—48. 
38. Sagalakova O. A., Truevtsev D. V., Stoyanova I. Ya., Sagalakov A. M. Sistemnyiy podhod v issledovanii antivitalnogo i sui tsidalnogo povedeniya // Meditsinskaya psihologiya v Rossii. 2015. № 6(35). URL: http: //mprj.ru.